Top of page links
Hello! Have you ever noticed that the links at the top of your user page don't work? -- Numbermaniac - T - C 07:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, yes. I noticed them now that I looked at them. It's likely from a failed experiment (^͜_^*) . Thanks for pointing it out. -- Bb 20 (Edits) 21:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. If you had copied them from Kanegasi's user page, they work on his because he has those pages at User:Kanegasi/nav and User:Kanegasi/info. -- Numbermaniac - T - C 01:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Cool. Also, replies aren't usually minor edits. Minor edits are when you do minor changes like spelling, grammar, punctuation, or even your cleanup at Hardware performance. :D -- Numbermaniac - T - C 01:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Links on your user page
Hello! (Again :P)
Anyway, the links for your talk page and Hardwaree performance can be formatted with double square brackets, so you don't need the beginning of the link. Wat I mean is... [[Hardware performance]] instead of the full link. And also [[User talk:Bb 20]] for your user talk. -- Numbermaniac - T - C 06:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed up the coding! Glad you could help point out these things for me :) -- Bb 20 (Edits) 07:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Just in the way you had all edits minor, my settings watch every page I edit. S your user and talk page are in my watchlist, lol. -- Numbermaniac - T - C 07:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hardware performance
I added those comments add Hardware performance/create. Should those comments be there? I added them as a simple "tutorial" of each parameter. –- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 02:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- I believe that the examples that I edited for Hardware performance/intro and in Hardware_performance#Computer_specifications already do justice for users in explaining what goes where. I'm afraid it would add something awful to clutter though.-- Bb 20 (Edits) 02:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- So shall I remove those comments? –- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 02:58, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah. Not that it was a bad idea though. On an unrelated note, to make editing easier for now, how about creating a '== Results for 1.5 - 1.5.1 ==' section where older results can be "archived"(moved) but won't show up in the '== Results ==' area when being edited. Thoughts? -- Bb 20 (Edits) 03:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- I like the idea. Would you like to do? Because I have to go. –- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 03:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)