As part of the Unified Community Platform project, your wiki will be migrated to the new platform in the next few weeks. Read more here.

Template talk:Item

From Minecraft Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Should not there be a "stackable" option? – Scaler (t) 00:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Or even a "stack limit" for things that only stack to 16, like Snowballs. Yomikoma 00:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Ok, done. Another example: BookScaler (t) 00:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


There should be a field for renewability, so a user does not have to go search through Renewable Resources to find out if an item, such as Gold, is renewable (it is). Supuhstar 03:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

This page belonging to a user has been blanked.
This has most likely been done due to the presence of broken links on the page (due to either outdated links or outright linking to nonexistent pages), usage of deprecated infobox parameters, and/or the general inactivity of said user (defined as no edits for at least 1 year, although exceptions can sometimes be made).
If you are the owner of this page, then you can revert this blanking by going into this page's History tab, and then reverting all edits down to and including the blanking edit. Images formerly on your page may have been deleted, so contact the wiki administrators to have them restored.
However, keep in mind that it is your responsibility to make sure links, files and templates you have placed on your userpage continue to point to the pages they are intended to, as well as that your userspace is free of scripting errors and other errors which may cause your userpages to be added to maintenance categories. Failure to fix these may result in subsequent re-blanking.
Please do not revert this if you are not the owner of this userpage.
  • Mockup/Example to the right Supuhstar 03:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
    • I'll take your lack of a response as a "that's alright". If you don't like it, remove it, but I'll start implementing it, now. Supuhstar 02:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Change default image size to 160px?[edit]

If we changed the default image size to 160px, we'd be able to directly scale up item sprites to 10x, instead of having to scale up to 8x then add 22px of padding around it. Maybe larger images could apply to all infoboxes with a single image, but it matters most on this one where we're using scaled up sprites rather than renders. MattTalk
⎜ 11:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Is this still actual? —Dand0 (talk) 12:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Matt? dand0 (talk) 07:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
What? Nothings changed here. MajrTalk
13:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
I mean, will that be implemented? dand0 (talk) 11:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Dunno. There's been no response. MajrTalk
10:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)