Template talk:History2

From Minecraft Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Alignment[edit]

Why is it that all of the version stages (Classic, Indev etc) aren't lined up perfectly in the middle. The notable one being Classic which is quite a bit to the left. GoandgooTalk
Contribs
Edit count
10:57, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Classic is the only one not in the middle, because the [show details] button is taking up space on the right. ultradude25Talk
Contribs
11:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Ah ok, I was wondering why it was doing that. GoandgooTalk
Contribs
Edit count
11:40, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Overview-only lines[edit]

We have lines that only show in details mode (snapshot history shown) and lines that show in both modes. A way to add lines that only show in overview mode would be neat. Have a look at Redstone Comparator#History for example: The “Redstone Comparator added” line should only be shown in overview mode. Would this be possible? —Fenhl 05:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Are we ever going to use this?[edit]

This template was created 5 1/2 years ago by Majr. It hasn't been edited at all ever since then, except for updating the documentation style in late 2014 without changing anything about the actual template. However, it still says that it is in development and it is not used in any articles. It also seems very outdated. So, what should we do with this template? Should we work on updating it to eventually make it the new history template? Should we delete it? Or should we keep it "in development" for eternity? I'm not saying that's a bad thing, I'm just saying... I also think it's worth noting that the history template has changed a LOT since this template was created. (see the diff)-- Madminecrafter12Orange Glazed Terracotta.pngTalk to meLight Blue Glazed Terracotta.png 14:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Anybody have any opinions on this?-- Madminecrafter12Orange Glazed Terracotta.pngTalk to meLight Blue Glazed Terracotta.png 14:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I do not see much use to keeping it, except that the example may make it slightly easier to implement in {{history}} if that is ever desired. It would take quite a bit to get this template up to date with the other one, and arguably should be done in a module now anyways. KnightMiner t/c 14:29, 11 June 2018 (UTC)