Talk: Editable user page

Move to clearer name?

The name "MoreEditors" seems rather arbitrary; it doesn't really tell what it means (unlike stub, wip, etc.).

Perhaps move the page to something like "Editable user page", it's a lot more clear, and more likely to be found. (previously suggested "UserPageEditable")

FVbico (talk) 11:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't necessarily like the weird title without spaces either. I would support moving to Template:Editable user page or something similar.-- Madminecrafter12^{Talk to me} 13:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Support "Editable user page". --AttemptToCallNil (report bug, view backtrace) 14:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Oh, much better, yes. Changed the original suggestion to that instead. FVbico (talk) 14:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support renaming. david92003 (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

FVbico: you made the discussion a bit less meaningful when you just edited your previous post in response to feedback. A better option would have been striking out the part of your proposal you no longer support. --AttemptToCallNil (report bug, view backtrace) 17:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support "Editable user page". – Jack McKalling [ ] 18:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support Anything else that has been suggested so far is most certainly a better name for this template. Personally I don't like using spaces in a template unless it's for a subtemplate of an existing one, but as long as it's clearly named that's the important thing. DSquirrelGM𝓣𝓟𝓒 19:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

What's wrong with spaces in template names? CamelCased names are hardly faster to type because you have to use Shift. --AttemptToCallNil (report bug, view backtrace) 19:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

That's just a preference to naming convention, but it isn't a naming convention applied to all templates here, see {{archive}} vs. {{archive box}}, and {{cat plug}}, {{dead link}} and {{in use}}. I wouldn't mind either way, just get away from "MoreEditors". – Jack McKalling [ ] 19:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)