We are currently performing an upgrade to our software. This upgrade will bring MediaWiki from version 1.31 to 1.33. While the upgrade is being performed on your wiki it will be in read-only mode. For more information check here.

Talk:Markus Persson/Archive 1

From Minecraft Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This is an archive page of Talk:Markus Persson. Do not edit this page.
New sections can be added at the current talk page.


Are you serious? This wiki is so unprofessional. :\

[Tank]Yes it is, but we all love it anyways
I agree. It brings shame to the other articles. If it were up to me, I'd delete this and replace it with some real information. Noroom 09:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes, because lest we forget, some people are more serious about Wiki than anything else, even Minecraft. HaphazardJoy 03:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Its about Notch, He is the Chuck Norris of the Nerds, it shouldnt be true, EVER. --Who Is This Notch I Hear Of 17:23, 25 October 2010 (CDT)

Pretty much this entire page needs to be trashed and re-written. The rest of Minepedia is useful information. Why does this look like it was copy/pasted from Encyclopedia Dramatica by some 12-year-old? If I wanted to read something that would make me feel dumb, I'd just go to ED. One ED is enough. --Pulseczar 10:20, 22 December 2010 (CST)


- notch's myspace site? http://www.myspace.com/markuspersson

~I don't think so. SeanNanoware 00:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

-Damn AWESOME article. Two thumbs up. -Jaryth -- 20:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Valve Time

Totally not ripping the "Valve Time" joke from here. --Vegeta897 11:10, 18 September 2010 (CDT) .

that IS the joke.--Kizzycocoa 11:17, 18 September 2010 (CDT)


Does building a large solid gold statue of him bring good luck to my server...? Lava flowing out of one hand, water out of another...

Yes Kamizushi 03:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


The line that Notch isn't stackable, unless with ez... isn't that a bit suggestive? –The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jaeil (Talk|Contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

I think that's the point. User:Ultradude25 (User talk:Ultradude25|Special:Contributions/Ultradude25) at 04:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I personally dislike that comment on their myself.--Kizzycocoa 02:20, 12 November 2010 (CST)

Time formats

Someone needs to decide on one time format here - some are DD/MM/YYYY and some others are MM/DD/YYYY. Doesn't matter which one, but it needs to be consistent. Perhaps we should use the "November 17, 2010" format so it's absolutely clear to everyone. --meioziz 12:13, 17 November 2010 (CST) We should NEVER use the DD/MM/YYYY or MM/DD/YYYY version as unless the day is higher than 12, you have no idea which is which. I've always been changing things to 17th of November 2010 as that looks the nicest. User:Ultradude25 (User talk:Ultradude25|Special:Contributions/Ultradude25) at 15:48, 17 November 2010 (CST)


This article should consist of real information and needs to be rewritten as this is an encyclopedia, while the "joke" parts are moved to another namespace. --Fifteen (talk | contribs) 09:24, 19 November 2010 (CST)

hey, a developer wiki that has MUCH higher standards than us keeps Notch Time. I think we can afford a humour leak here and there. especially on such a silly page that is marked as a joke. :/
think of it as a one-off. hell, the page in all fairness shouldn't even exist.--Kizzycocoa 14:03, 19 November 2010 (CST)
Imagine someone looking for info about Notch, then finds this page.
"Hey, what's this? The page has been vandalized..."
--Fifteen (talk | contribs) 14:18, 19 November 2010 (CST)
those people are silly for not reading the JOKE TEMPLATE o-o--Kizzycocoa 14:32, 19 November 2010 (CST)
Yeah, but we need a real article for Notch.
"Hey, what's this? There is no real article about Notch, just this joke page..."
--Fifteen (talk | contribs) 14:33, 19 November 2010 (CST)

Maybe we can keep this article how it is and have the "real" article at Markus Persson (which is currently a redirect to here), with a note at the top of here directing people who want the serious page. Toomai Glittershine 16:42, 19 November 2010 (CST)

give me one thing that this article doesn't have that the new one will. other than stalker-fuel :/ --Kizzycocoa 16:44, 19 November 2010 (CST)

Notch Time Survival part

Haha, that survival part is hilarious! :D I lol'd irl. Karsten 08:07, 3 December 2010 (CST)

A new page?

Can't we have a separate page for the old version? I already made and posted one, but it got deleted 12 seconds later. I rewrote it into a text file and it's on my desktop. I want to post it, but it will probably get deleted again. I rummaged through old versions and came up with this. --Reed501 20:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)