Difference between revisions of "Talk:Java Edition Classic 0.0.10a"

From Minecraft Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Tag: Mobile edit
Line 29: Line 29:
   
 
i mean,like the bug with the start and destroy function.Should it be moved to the bugs section?and also this version can be archived,but it may be useless to archive this version as this version is unplayable [[User:Twohundred4|Twohundred4]] ([[User talk:Twohundred4|talk]]) 00:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 
i mean,like the bug with the start and destroy function.Should it be moved to the bugs section?and also this version can be archived,but it may be useless to archive this version as this version is unplayable [[User:Twohundred4|Twohundred4]] ([[User talk:Twohundred4|talk]]) 00:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  +
:"and also this version can be archived,but it may be useless to archive this version as this version is unplayable" ???? Your point? [[User:Tolerabledruid6|Tolerabledruid6]] ([[User talk:Tolerabledruid6|talk]]) 20:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:33, 9 January 2021

Sapling texture change

Are we really sure that the sapling texture changed in this version? Because the texture files in rd-161348 are identical to the ones in 0.0.13a_03. They even have lava, water, and bedrock, which were not even conceived of at the time. I really don't think Notch included used texture file from four days into the future at first, removed and changed some textures, and then readded them in the next version. It is very likely that the texture files in rd-161348 are unoriginal. Why are we basing this hypothetical change off of a texture file in the previous version dated four days after it was released?

How this hasn't been noticed in the last six years is completely beyond me. 76.95.1.128 03:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

The rd versions don't seem to be originals, so it's likely that they just took the texture file from later versions of Classic. – Nixinova Nixinova sig1.png Nixinova sig2.png 03:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Yes, that is correct. This would mean that no change occurred in this version, and rd-161348 very likely had the same texture as this and 11a. 76.95.1.128 22:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Any pre-alpha version in the launcher is either mislabelled or modified in some way. In this case, they appear to have swapped out the texture files for some reason. Tolerabledruid6 (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Not being able to build inside yourself

In rd-161348 one was still able to build inside themselves, as of 0.0.11a, this ability was removed, but when exactly was this removed ? My guess is in this version alongside the new build/destroy mode but is there any better proof ? 69.127.96.14 19:30, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

It was removed in 0.0.9a Twohundred4 (talk) 00:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Pressing ESC will release the mouse without pausing the game

Like my previous topic I noticed the unlike rd-161348 pressing ESC in 0.0.11a will release the mouse but not pause the game (unlike F10+ESC+ALT). Was this added in 0.0.10a or earlier ? 69.127.96.14 19:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

I’m pretty sure the menu for pausing the game was added in 0.0.13a Twohundred4 (talk) 00:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Page deletion

I don't understand why this page should be deleted. I dissagree. DEJVOSS (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

177.37.195.233 17:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Should this page be improved?

i mean,like the bug with the start and destroy function.Should it be moved to the bugs section?and also this version can be archived,but it may be useless to archive this version as this version is unplayable Twohundred4 (talk) 00:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

"and also this version can be archived,but it may be useless to archive this version as this version is unplayable" ???? Your point? Tolerabledruid6 (talk) 20:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)