The Gamepedia and Fandom account systems have now been merged. If your username is incorrect, you have accounts on both platforms that weren't merged, or you have trouble signing in, please submit a support ticket.
Talk:Block of Quartz
Come to think of it, is this reversible?
I don't see a recipe for getting back the quartz items, and the recipes I do see look more like sandstone than like a mineral block. When mined, does the basic block drop 4 quartz, or itself? If it's not reversible, then this isn't a storage block. --Mental Mouse 03:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It is not a storage block, the blocks only drop themselves.
Also, the Block of Quartz has a really low blast resistance, when a creeper exploded within a 5x5x3 block of it, all the blocks in a radius of 2 blocks were gone. Only the corners remained. So, probably a similar blast resistance to dirt. -kastor1994
I would concur with kastor1994 on quartz block's blast resistance. I tested blast resistance by setting off a TNT block inside a 5x5x5 chunk of different materials (gold ore, quartz, stone, dirt, grass) and the remains most resembled dirt or grass blocks - almost completely obliterated - so I would surmise that it's either 2.5 or 3. -- darkwyrm
Why does the "see also" link to a page on "decorations" (I.e. flowers, saplings, mushrooms) in CLASSIC? This should be fixed or removed. --220.127.116.11 01:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks, whoever fixed it. --18.104.22.168 15:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Pillar Quartz in Wrong Place
- This page is about all quartz variants. And JS has nothing to do with it. –Matt ᐸ Talk
Contribs ⎜ 14:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Where does the image of the three-sided pillar come from? As far as I can see, it's not in the game: /setblock doesn't offer it, the debug stick can't get it into that state and it's not on the block states page. Fabian42 (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- It exists only in bedrock edition, see data values section. FVbico (talk) 21:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't think the topics are diverse enough to warrant separate pages, and definitely not 5 separate pages. I might support splitting smooth quartz into its own page, as it's the most different. Otherwise, Oppose the split. -PancakeIdentity (talk) 22:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
I would propose following the way stone splits up and have “block of quartz” “quartz bricks” and “smooth quartz” as their own pages and continuing to have chiseled and quartz pillars as sub-blocks within “block of quartz”. I think that’s consistent with the way other pages are structured and doesn’t created a whole different page for each and every block. I Approve the split if done this way. Adeseo (talk) 06:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'd Support this, though not for the reasoning discussed below. They just feel like obvious places to draw the lines. -PancakeIdentity (talk) 21:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'd Support this split, I think that the quartz pillars and the chiseled quartz block doesn't have enough features to have its own pages.--Wappeynappey444 (talk) 01:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- I also Support this split, because Quartz Bricks seem to have substantially different crafting use information from Quartz Blocks, and while Smooth Quartz can also be used to craft slabs and stairs currently requires an unusual footnote. Splitting in this way would most effectively simplify the crafting information, which is currently about half of the page. EiimRun (talk) 20:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
I Support splitting Smooth Quartz and Quartz Bricks. Currently, my philosophy is that every block which can be made into other blocks like slabs and stairs, should get their own page. Chiseled Quartz and Quartz Pillars cannot, so they don't necessarily need get their own page.
- This seems pretty reasonable, Weak support for that right now. By that logic, sandstone would be split into "sandstone" (+ chiseled), "cut sandstone" and "smooth sandstone", and stone bricks into "stone bricks" (+ cracked and chiseled) and "mossy stone bricks", right? What about red sandstone or red nether bricks, would they be split?--Capopanzone (talk | contribs) 20:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- I Strongly oppose the split. They are very similar and it would be an excess of pages. Also, Thomanski wants to talk about Sandstone. This talk page is meant to discuss topics about Quartz Blocks. If you want to discuss sandstone, go to the Sandstone talk page. —22.214.171.124 14:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Can we decide on this please? —126.96.36.199 14:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- How would you feel about a 2 or 3 page split as discussed above? -PancakeIdentity (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
I Support spitting it up because it would make it easier to document things that are unique to each block, such as Bedrock Edition accidentally using the regular Quartz texture for Smooth Quartz for more than a year now, how Chiseled Quartz was flipped after the 1.14 re-texture, and information about upcoming Quartz blocks, etc. Adervae48272 (talk) 20:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I think the best way to do it would be to have one page for the normal block of quartz, and another for all the variants like smooth quartz, quartz bricks...etc. like how stone has it's own page and it's variants, stone bricks, cracked stone bricks...etc. have their own page.--Pxlop860 (talk) 07:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose for splitting no, the reason why smooth stone, stone, and stone brick were split was because 1. smooth stone is used to craft blast furnace and stone brick is purley decorational and stone has many purposes. Splitting this is unnesicary because these ALL these blocks serve no purpose except for decoration so like the only thing different is crafting recepie, no split at all, keep them together.Humiebee (talk) (contrib) 22:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose. As long as the individual blocks lack their own unique purposes, splitting this article would lead to needless duplication of content. When one or two of them eventually become useful for something other than decoration, those can be split out. But at this time, it's too soon. ~ Amatulic (talk) 04:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Bugged crafting in Bedrock 1.16.
This bug is affecrting quartz bricks and all new nether blocks recepies in Bedrock. Currently crafting table returns 1 block insted of intended 4. Use of stonecutter is advised. --19:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)