Moving paintings[]
The move notice clearly states to not move the page by copy-pasting it. Please be more careful next time. -- Hower64 01:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- I had put it on the Admin Notice board, but I didn't notice that it was already placed there. Extreme 01:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Issues[]
you are treading a fine line. do not backseat moderate other users, especially when lying to them to try to get your way.
there was no consensus on the issue page. there was not discussion. you posted a single comment, and then thought to copy/paste the whole talk page WHICH THE PREVIOUS SECTION MADE CLEAR NOT TO DO, and then made out we discussed this.
if I catch you attempting to copy/paste the contents of a page to move them, or telling other users that consensus was had when it clearly wasn't, I will resort to bans. consider this a warning. --Kizzycocoa 22:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know exactly how I "lied", for moving yes ,I did move them incorrectly and I acknowledge you for that. I originally was going to leave as-is but there was dispute on weather the pages stay as-is since people kept adding issues to the pages. I posted the issue to the admin notice board, but I didn't get any word on what was to be done. Concluding, sorry about the disputes that have happened.
- you lied to a user stating a majority decision has been made to move these pages to a new structure. There has been no decision. In fact, the header of the issues page makes it clear any issues being recorded are purely for archive purposes, meaning we are fully aware people are still editing the page.
- There was no dispute. this was not a life-or-death heated argument. people were not being tricked into editing.
- as for the noticeboard, I am unable to find the issues discussion. I am able to find issues about problems accessing the noticeboard, not none about what to do with the system. upon seeing your contribs, you seem to have primarily posted issues to do with vandalism on the admin page. --Kizzycocoa 23:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- I just posted that to the admin board. Extreme 00:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC) I'm not trying to argue with you, but your just trying to make me. >_>
- so, you're saying you got a consensus from the admin noticeboard, from a post you've just posted, just this second.
- hell, even if it were a day ago, you'd need to wait a hell of a lot longer for a proper consensus. --Kizzycocoa 00:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- For one, i'm tired of typing colons and receiving a hundred notification emails . I was talking about vandalism when I "just" posted. And yes, I do know that I didn't get an approval. Point is, I did post on the admin notice board and I didn't take in consideration that it would be undone. Just because of this doesn't mean total destruction of the wiki. I only targeted the issues page because they were marked for deletion and dispute. If you look at my contributions, I don't just move things. When I joined the site to make a little edit, I didn't think about actually monitoring the forums. Then I found a page that was badly written and went ahead and rewrote it. From there, I started working on the wiki, If you really just are that against me, then go and ban me. My point is, i'm not trying to mess up the wiki behind your back.
- I just posted that to the admin board. Extreme 00:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC) I'm not trying to argue with you, but your just trying to make me. >_>
Edit warring[]
Please stop edit warring with other users. Revert once, and if they continue, please post it on the Minecraft Wiki:Admin noticeboard for additional admin attention. Continuing the edit war simply disrupts the wiki. -- Wynthyst 
talk 23:41, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Story of Mojang[]
If you were referring to what was said on the talk page, keep in mind that post was made over a year ago; I can't see any neutrality problems with the article now. -- Hower64 01:00, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
trademark shit[]
Hey. Read every little world before calling some on on trademark shit. --007a83 (Talk|Contribs) 01:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)